Emmanuel Gonquoi, Commander in Chief of the Economic Freedom Fighters of Liberia (EFFL), has unleashed a wave of criticism against the Supreme Court of Liberia, labelling its judges as “cowards” in the wake of their ruling on a controversial legislative case. The comments were made during an interview on Saturday, December 7, following the Supreme Court’s decision to dismiss the case between the Majority and Minority blocs in the Legislature.
The case revolved around a dispute concerning procedural and governance issues in the Legislature, with both blocs accusing each other of overstepping their authority. The matter was brought before the Supreme Court, which ruled it as ultra vires—beyond the scope of the judiciary’s authority. The ruling effectively redirected the issue back to the Legislature for resolution, avoiding direct judicial intervention.
Gonquoi, however, expressed deep dissatisfaction with the Court’s decision, describing it as a betrayal of the judiciary’s role in upholding justice and providing clarity on critical constitutional matters. “This ruling is a clear indication that the judiciary has failed to stand up for justice and fairness in such a critical matter. They have demonstrated cowardice in their refusal to take a stand,” he said.
The EFFL leader’s criticism extended beyond the specific case, accusing the Supreme Court of repeatedly shying away from bold decisions whenever the government is involved with a case.
Gonquoi claimed the Court’s reluctance to make decisive rulings in politically sensitive cases undermines its credibility and weakens the country’s democratic institutions.
“Whenever the government is involved, the Supreme Court retreats instead of standing firm. They are not bold enough to ensure justice prevails,” Gonqui said. He further emphasized that such a posture from the judiciary creates a dangerous precedent, where public confidence in the rule of law erodes, and political disputes remain unresolved.
The Supreme Court’s ruling, which sidestepped taking a definitive stance, has fueled frustration among those who view the judiciary as the ultimate arbiter of disputes. Gonqui’s remarks reflect a broader sentiment among opposition figures, who often accuse Liberia’s judiciary of partiality and political interference.
Meanwhile, the unresolved dispute in the Legislature continues to hinder effective governance, with both blocs entrenching their positions. Political analysts warn that if such disagreements persist without resolution, they could exacerbate tensions and disrupt legislative functions.
Gonquoi’s comments have sparked reactions across the political spectrum, with supporters commending his outspokenness and critics accusing him of undermining the judiciary. As the situation develops, the Supreme Court’s ruling and the broader issues it raises are likely to remain subjects of national debate in the coming weeks.
